Why UFLPA compliance can’t pause during organizational change
For a leading multi-brand apparel retailer, forced labor compliance isn’t optional. The Uyghur Forced Labor Prevention Act (UFLPA), enforced by U.S. Customs and Border Protection (CBP), creates a rebuttable presumption that goods made in whole or in part in Xinjiang, China — or by entities on the UFLPA Entity List — were produced with forced labor and may not enter the United States. The presumption can be overcome only with clear and convincing evidence. Apparel has consistently ranked among the top sectors targeted under UFLPA enforcement. For an apparel retailer with a global supply chain, every shipment carries operational risk that traces back to forced labor due diligence done well before goods reach U.S. ports.One Kharon customer, a leading multi-brand apparel retailer, has had its compliance team navigating this work for years, across multiple portfolio configurations and generations of leadership. Through every iteration, Kharon has been at the center of how the team conducts due diligence.
What new leadership and a vendor audit revealed
The organization had expanded its portfolio of retail brands. At the same time, a new team of senior leaders had joined and were focused on improving operational efficiency across the business. The compliance team found itself working with new executive leadership that hadn’t originally chosen any of the vendors in the existing stack — including Kharon. The new leadership team initiated an internal audit of the entire vendor landscape. The compliance team had to defend every tool in the stack on its merits. An external legal consultant was brought in to advise specifically on UFLPA enforcement risk and whether the operational risk of cargo detentions still warranted continued investment in forced labor due diligence infrastructure.Each of those moments was an opportunity to replace, downsize, or eliminate any vendor in the compliance stack.
Why the retailer’s audit retained Kharon ClearView for forced labor due diligence
Coming out of the audit, the answer for the team was clear. With UFLPA enforcement active and CBP detentions in apparel continuing, the team’s forced labor due diligence work needed deep entity-level research — the kind that maps exposure to Xinjiang supply chains and high-risk labor transfer programs, identifies red flag indicators, and goes beyond what logistics and inventory platforms surface. That research is the same intelligence CBP and the U.S. Department of Homeland Security (DHS) rely on to enforce the UFLPA — exactly the standard the audit was looking for.Kharon ClearView sits at the center of how the team handles that work. ClearView allows the team to visualize the network around a supplier or counterparty — tracing material connections to entities on the UFLPA Entity List or that align with regulatory red flag indicators for forced labor risk in Xinjiang. That includes the cases that matter most in the apparel supply chain: documented co-mingling risk of Xinjiang cotton, third-party trading companies supplying Xinjiang-origin caustic soda to dyeing mills, and the movement of minority laborers from Xinjiang to suppliers in every step of the supply chain.
That capability is what the audit’s external legal review confirmed. The compliance team’s UFLPA workflows depend on Kharon’s subject matter expert-led research — not on raw data feeds or open-source aggregation. After the audit, the retailer eliminated several solutions, but Kharon ClearView was retained as the foundation for forced labor due diligence workflows.
That outcome wasn't a one-time validation. The organization and teams supporting the retailer's trade compliance work have changed substantially. But the workflows that protect against UFLPA detention risk remain anchored on the same source of truth: Kharon.
Consistent forced labor research across a changing organization
That continuity is supported by something the apparel retailer has experienced consistently across the relationship: the same access to Kharon’s platform and team of experts at every portfolio configuration the retailer has operated. As the portfolio has grown and evolved, Kharon’s support has scaled with it — every brand, from the smallest to the largest, gets the same access to subject matter expertise and the same turnaround on time-sensitive forced labor research.For leaders across sourcing, supply chain, and compliance in this industry, that continuity isn’t an abstract benefit. It’s the difference between maintaining a defensible, consistent forced labor due diligence posture across organizational change, and starting over every time leadership changes or budgets get re-scrutinized. In a category where audit-ready documentation and consistent enforcement posture matter, “starting over” is not an acceptable outcome.
Building a dynamic and durable UFLPA compliance program
The apparel retailer’s experience highlights the key decision every retail and apparel compliance leader eventually faces: determining which parts of the compliance stack provide continuity through change, whether that change is internal—such as new leadership, or vendor audits — or external, like regulatory shifts, enforcement cycles, or geopolitical pressure. The infrastructure that carries forced labor compliance through those moments isn’t optional or replaceable — it’s foundational.For this retailer, that foundation is Kharon. For years, through a turnover of senior leadership and a vendor review by the team that followed, Kharon has remained at the center of how the team does its UFLPA work — and how it will continue to do that work as the organization and the regulatory environment continue to evolve. Today, every shipment is backed by the same audit-ready research, regardless of which brands sit in the portfolio or who runs the program.
See how leading apparel teams manage UFLPA risk.
Learn more about how Kharon supports the retail and apparel sector with our Forced Labor solutions.Request a demo to learn more.
